This is a friendship network of a cohort of girls attending a school in Western Scotland. Girls were asked to nominate up to 12 best friends and also surveyed about their substance use and sports participation. This is the first wave out of three data waves.
This is a friendship network of a cohort of girls attending a school in Western Scotland. Girls were asked to nominate up to 12 best friends and also surveyed about their substance use and sports participation. This is the second wave out of three data waves.
This is a friendship network of a cohort of girls attending a school in Western Scotland. Girls were asked to nominate up to 12 best friends and also surveyed about their substance use and sports participation. This is the third wave out of three data waves.
This is a network of interactions among students living in a fraternity at a West Virginia college. An observer recorded the number of times a pair of subjects were seen in conversation by walking through the public areas of the building every fifteen minutes, 21 hours a day, for five days.
This is a network of interactions among students living in a fraternity at a West Virginia college. An observer recorded the number of times a pair of subjects were seen in conversation by walking through the public areas of the building every fifteen minutes, 21 hours a day, for five days.
This network records amateur HAM radio calls made over a one-month period, as monitored by a voice-activated recording device.
This network records amateur HAM radio operators perceptions of how frequently they talked to other operators, judged retrospectively at the end of the one-month sampling period. A value of 0 meaning no interaction up to a maximum of 9.
This network includes the observed frequency of interactions in a small business office. Observations were made as the observer patrolled a fixed route through the office every fifteen minutes during two four-day periods.
This network includes rankings of interaction frequency as recalled by the employees in a small business office over the two-week period. The rankings go from 1 for the most frequent to 39 for the least frequent.
This network concerns  frequency record of interactions, made by an observer every half-hour during one five-day work week in a technical research group at a West Virginia university.
This network concerns the personal rankings of the remembered frequency of interactions in one five-day work week in a technical research group at a West Virginia university. The rankings go from 1 for the most frequent up to 36 for the least frequent.
This is an interaction network from a three week conference where participants were asked to rank how often they interacted with one another. A 1 indicates the person the interacted with the most, 17 indicates the person they interacted with the least. This data is from the first of two waves.
This is an interaction network from a three week conference where participants were asked to rank how often they interacted with one another. A 1 indicates the person the interacted with the most, 17 indicates the person they interacted with the least. This data is from the second of two waves.
This is a trade matrix for manufactured goods. All trade is from row to column.
This is a trade matrix for food/live animals goods. All trade is from row to column.
This is a trade matrix for crude materials. All trade is from row to column.
This is a trade matrix for minerals and fuel. All trade is from row to column.
This is a matrix of exchange between diplomats. All diplomacy is from row to column.
This is a friendship matrix that is coded as follows: 4 = close personal friend, 3= friend, 2= person I've met, 1 = person I've heard of but not met, and 0 = person unknown to me. This is the first of two waves.
This is a friendship matrix that is coded as follows: 4 = close personal friend, 3= friend, 2= person I've met, 1 = person I've heard of but not met, and 0 = person unknown to me. This is the second of two waves.
This is a matrix of communication on an Electronic Information Exchange System (EIES).Each cell indicates how many electronic messages were sent.
This is a friendship matrix of prisoners collected in the 1950s.
This is a network of multi-relation interactions among a group of miners in Zambia.
This is a network of uni-relation interactions among a group of miners in Zambia.
This is a network of  "sociational" (friendship, socioemotional) interactions in a tailor shop in Zambia. This is the first of two waves. An abortive strike happened after this wave.
This is a network of  "sociational" (friendship, socioemotional) interactions in a tailor shop in Zambia. This is the second of two waves. A successful strike happened after this wave.
This is a network of  "instrumental" (work- and assistance-related) interactions in a tailor shop in Zambia. This is the first of two waves. An abortive strike happened after this wave.
This is a network of  "instrumental" (work- and assistance-related) interactions in a tailor shop in Zambia. This is the second of two waves. A successful strike happened after this wave.
This is a network of information exchange between organizations.
This is a network of monetary exchange between networks.
This is an advice giving network. A tie indicates that the row manager goes to the column manager for advice.
This is a friendship network. Managers were asked who their friends were.
In this network a tie represents that the row manager reports to the column manager
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct an advice giving network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the advice giving network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct an advice giving network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the advice giving network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct an advice giving network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the advice giving network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct an advice giving network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the advice giving network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct an advice giving network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the advice giving network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct an advice giving network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the advice giving network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct an advice giving network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the advice giving network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct an advice giving network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the advice giving network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct an advice giving network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the advice giving network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct an advice giving network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the advice giving network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct an advice giving network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the advice giving network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct an advice giving network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the advice giving network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct an advice giving network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the advice giving network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct an advice giving network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the advice giving network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct an advice giving network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the advice giving network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct an advice giving network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the advice giving network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct an advice giving network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the advice giving network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct an advice giving network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the advice giving network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct an advice giving network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the advice giving network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct an advice giving network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the advice giving network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct an advice giving network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the advice giving network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct a friendship network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the friendship  network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct a friendship network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the friendship  network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct a friendship network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the friendship  network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct a friendship network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the friendship  network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct a friendship network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the friendship  network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct a friendship network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the friendship  network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct a friendship network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the friendship  network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct a friendship network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the friendship  network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct a friendship network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the friendship  network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct a friendship network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the friendship  network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct a friendship network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the friendship  network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct a friendship network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the friendship  network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct a friendship network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the friendship  network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct a friendship network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the friendship  network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct a friendship network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the friendship  network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct a friendship network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the friendship  network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct a friendship network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the friendship  network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct a friendship network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the friendship  network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct a friendship network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the friendship  network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct a friendship network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the friendship  network.
This network is based of cognitive social structure data. Each manager was asked to construct a friendship network for all of the managers in the company. This is one of the managers perceptions of the friendship  network.
This is a valued network of fraternity brothers who were living together in a house. They were asked to rank their peers in order of their preferences. A score of 1 means that brother was the respondents' first choice. A score of 17 means that brother was the respondents' last choice. This is the network observed in week 1.
This is a valued network of fraternity brothers who were living together in a house. They were asked to rank their peers in order of their preferences. A score of 1 means that brother was the respondents' first choice. A score of 17 means that brother was the respondents' last choice. This is the network observed in week 2.
This is a valued network of fraternity brothers who were living together in a house. They were asked to rank their peers in order of their preferences. A score of 1 means that brother was the respondents' first choice. A score of 17 means that brother was the respondents' last choice. This is the network observed in week 3.
This is a valued network of fraternity brothers who were living together in a house. They were asked to rank their peers in order of their preferences. A score of 1 means that brother was the respondents' first choice. A score of 17 means that brother was the respondents' last choice. This is the network observed in week 4.
This is a valued network of fraternity brothers who were living together in a house. They were asked to rank their peers in order of their preferences. A score of 1 means that brother was the respondents' first choice. A score of 17 means that brother was the respondents' last choice. This is the network observed in week 5.
This is a valued network of fraternity brothers who were living together in a house. They were asked to rank their peers in order of their preferences. A score of 1 means that brother was the respondents' first choice. A score of 17 means that brother was the respondents' last choice. This is the network observed in week 6.
This is a valued network of fraternity brothers who were living together in a house. They were asked to rank their peers in order of their preferences. A score of 1 means that brother was the respondents' first choice. A score of 17 means that brother was the respondents' last choice. This is the network observed in week 7.
This is a valued network of fraternity brothers who were living together in a house. They were asked to rank their peers in order of their preferences. A score of 1 means that brother was the respondents' first choice. A score of 17 means that brother was the respondents' last choice. This is the network observed in week 8.
This is a valued network of fraternity brothers who were living together in a house. They were asked to rank their peers in order of their preferences. A score of 1 means that brother was the respondents' first choice. A score of 17 means that brother was the respondents' last choice. This is the network observed in week 9.
This is a valued network of fraternity brothers who were living together in a house. They were asked to rank their peers in order of their preferences. A score of 1 means that brother was the respondents' first choice. A score of 17 means that brother was the respondents' last choice. This is the network observed in week 10.
This is a valued network of fraternity brothers who were living together in a house. They were asked to rank their peers in order of their preferences. A score of 1 means that brother was the respondents' first choice. A score of 17 means that brother was the respondents' last choice. This is the network observed in week 11.
This is a valued network of fraternity brothers who were living together in a house. They were asked to rank their peers in order of their preferences. A score of 1 means that brother was the respondents' first choice. A score of 17 means that brother was the respondents' last choice. This is the network observed in week 12.
This is a valued network of fraternity brothers who were living together in a house. They were asked to rank their peers in order of their preferences. A score of 1 means that brother was the respondents' first choice. A score of 17 means that brother was the respondents' last choice. This is the network observed in week 13.
This is a valued network of fraternity brothers who were living together in a house. They were asked to rank their peers in order of their preferences. A score of 1 means that brother was the respondents' first choice. A score of 17 means that brother was the respondents' last choice. This is the network observed in week 14.
This is a valued network of fraternity brothers who were living together in a house. They were asked to rank their peers in order of their preferences. A score of 1 means that brother was the respondents' first choice. A score of 17 means that brother was the respondents' last choice. This is the network observed in week 15.
This is a network of marriage alliances among Renaissance Florentine families.
This is a network of business ties among Renaissance Florentine families.
This is a network of alliance ties among tribal groups in  Eastern Central Highlands of New Guinea.
This is a network of antagonism ties among tribal groups in  Eastern Central Highlands of New Guinea.
This is a network of employees in a bank wiring room.
This is a network of employees in a bank wiring room.
This is a network of employees in a bank wiring room.
This is a network of employees in a bank wiring room.
This is a network of employees in a bank wiring room.
This is a valued network of employees in a bank wiring room. The value refers to the number of times the employees traded jobs.
This is a network of friendship. Monks were asked to name the three peers they liked the most in their monastery. 3 indicates their highest or first choice and 1 their last choice. This is data taken at 1 of 3 waves.
This is a network of friendship. Monks were asked to name the three peers they liked the most in their monestary. 3 indicates their highest or first choice and 1 their last choice. This is data taken at 2 of 3 waves.
This is a network of friendship. Monks were asked to name the three peers they liked the most in their monestary. 3 indicates their highest or first choice and 1 their last choice. This is data taken at 3 of 3 waves.
This is a network of monks who were asked to name the three peers they disliked the most in their monestary. 3 indicates their highest or first choice and 1 their last choice.
This is a network of monks who were asked to name the three peers they held in the highest esteem in their monestary. 3 indicates their highest or first choice and 1 their last choice.
This is a network of monks who were asked to name the three peers they held in the lowest esteem in their monestary. 3 indicates their highest or first choice and 1 their last choice.
This is a network of monks who were asked to name the three peers who were the most positive influences in their monestary. 3 indicates their highest or first choice and 1 their last choice.
This is a network of monks who were asked to name the three peers who were the most negative influences in their monestary. 3 indicates their highest or first choice and 1 their last choice.
This is a network of monks who were asked to name the three peers who they praised the most in their monestary. 3 indicates their highest or first choice and 1 their last choice.
This is a network of monks who were asked to name the three peers who they blamed the most in their monestary. 3 indicates their highest or first choice and 1 their last choice.
This is a network of Taro exchange among 22 households in a Papuan village.
This is a network of corporate interlocks among the major business entities of the Germany. The network is valued.
This is a network of corporate interlocks among the major business entities of the Netherlands. The network is valued.
The informal organizational chart of the employees at an office.
The formal organizational chart of the employees at an office.
Kinship network of a troop of monkeys.
Valued interaction network of a troop of monkeys.
Network of interaction ties within a karate club
Valued network of interaction ties in a karate club where higher values indicate more interaction.
Network of interaction between police precincts in Buffalo, NY.
Network of interaction among the Carter administration at year 1.
Network of interaction among the Carter administration at year 4.
Network of lending drug needles in Hartford.
Smaller subsample of the drugnet network of lending drug needles in Hartford.
Film actors/actresses who costarred in movies together. The diagonal represents the number of movies each actor individually starred in.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Communication network perceived by one actor in the network.
Valued network of food sharing in a village in Venezuela.
Network indicating which villagers are mother-offspring pairs
Network indicating which villagers are full-sibling pairs
Network indicating which villagers are close kin
Network indicating which villagers are other kin (not mother/offspring, full-sibling, or close)
Valued Les Mis_rables_co-occurrence matrix
Network of advice giving in an office
Valued network of conflict in an office.
Network of students who know one another
Network of students who socialize with one another
Network of students where a tie indicates that they give that person advice
Network of students where a tie indicates that they get advice from that student
Network of students who knew one another
Network of drug users where a tie indicates that they associated at a location together.
Ecological network of carbon flow.
Network of terrorists who are affiliated with one another
This is a network of all emails sent between department managers in a North Carolina county over a 3 month period in 2013.
This is a network of all emails sent between department managers in a North Carolina county over a 3 month period in 2013.
This is a network of all emails sent between department managers in a North Carolina county over a 3 month period in 2013.
This is a network of all emails sent between department managers in a North Carolina county over a 3 month period in 2013.
This is a network of all emails sent between department managers in a North Carolina county over a 3 month period in 2013.
This is a network of all emails sent between department managers in a North Carolina county over a 3 month period in 2013.
This is a network of all emails sent between department managers in a North Carolina county over a 3 month period in 2013.
This is a network of all emails sent between department managers in a North Carolina county over a 3 month period in 2013.
This is a network of all emails sent between department managers in a North Carolina county over a 3 month period in 2013.
This is a network of all emails sent between department managers in a North Carolina county over a 3 month period in 2013.
This is a network of all emails sent between department managers in a North Carolina county over a 3 month period in 2013.
This is a network of all emails sent between department managers in a North Carolina county over a 3 month period in 2013.
This is a network of all emails sent between department managers in a North Carolina county over a 3 month period in 2013.
This is a network of all emails sent between department managers in a North Carolina county over a 3 month period in 2013.
This is a network of all emails sent between department managers in a North Carolina county over a 3 month period in 2013.
This is a network of all emails sent between department managers in a North Carolina county over a 3 month period in 2013.
This is a network of all emails sent between department managers in a North Carolina county over a 3 month period in 2013.
This is a network measuring the number of times Senator I cosponsored a bill sponsored by senator j during a session of congress.
This is a network measuring the number of times Senator I cosponsored a bill sponsored by senator j during a session of congress.
This is a network measuring the number of times Senator I cosponsored a bill sponsored by senator j during a session of congress.
This is a network measuring the number of times Senator I cosponsored a bill sponsored by senator j during a session of congress.
This is a network measuring the number of times Senator I cosponsored a bill sponsored by senator j during a session of congress.
This is a network measuring the number of times Senator I cosponsored a bill sponsored by senator j during a session of congress.
This is a network measuring the number of times Senator I cosponsored a bill sponsored by senator j during a session of congress.
This is a network measuring the number of times Senator I cosponsored a bill sponsored by senator j during a session of congress.
This is a network measuring the number of times Senator I cosponsored a bill sponsored by senator j during a session of congress.
This is a network measuring the number of times Senator I cosponsored a bill sponsored by senator j during a session of congress.
This is a network measuring the number of times Senator I cosponsored a bill sponsored by senator j during a session of congress.
This is a network measuring the number of times Senator I cosponsored a bill sponsored by senator j during a session of congress.
This is a network measuring the number of times Senator I cosponsored a bill sponsored by senator j during a session of congress.
This is a network measuring the number of times Senator I cosponsored a bill sponsored by senator j during a session of congress.
This is a network measuring the number of times Senator I cosponsored a bill sponsored by senator j during a session of congress.
This is a network measuring the number of times Senator I cosponsored a bill sponsored by senator j during a session of congress.
This is a network measuring the number of times Senator I cosponsored a bill sponsored by senator j during a session of congress.
This is a network measuring the number of times Senator I cosponsored a bill sponsored by senator j during a session of congress.
Bison network with each edge representing a dominance relationship between bison in a herd
Frequent associations between dolphins
Interactions between free-ranging kangaroos
Each edge denotes that a monkey groomed another (weighted and directed)
Interactions between free-ranging zebras
Dominance relationship between cattle
Dominance relationship between hens
Dominance relationship between macaques
Dominance relationships between female bighorn sheep (directed
Email communication network between staff at UC Irvine (directed)
Face-to-face contacts at Infectious Diseases conference
Contacts between terrorists involved in the Madrid train bombing
Face-to-face contacts at Hypertext 2009 Conference
Contact between windsurfers in California during 1986 season
Collaboration between Jazz Musicians
Friendship between students in a Residence Hall at ANU
Seventh-graders nominated a classmate for three preferred activities
Friendship ratings between university students at a dutch college
Road connections between major European cities
Flights between major US airports
Connections between metabolic proteins in roundworms.
Human protein metabolic interactions
Protein interactions in PDZbase
Data represents peer support network from the famous Harry Potter book #1. For temporal structure and sample code, visit the source page.
Data represents peer support network from the famous Harry Potter book #2. For temporal structure and sample code, visit the source page.
Data represents peer support network from the famous Harry Potter book #3. For temporal structure and sample code, visit the source page.
Data represents peer support network from the famous Harry Potter book #4. For temporal structure and sample code, visit the source page.
Data represents peer support network from the famous Harry Potter book #5. For temporal structure and sample code, visit the source page.
Data represents peer support network from the famous Harry Potter book #6. For temporal structure and sample code, visit the source page.
Students in a Dutch secondary school were followed over a period of one year to study friendships and delinquency. This is data for the first wave
Students in a Dutch secondary school were followed over a period of one year to study friendships and delinquency. This is data for the second wave
Students in a Dutch secondary school were followed over a period of one year to study friendships and delinquency. This is data for the third wave
Students in a Dutch secondary school were followed over a period of one year to study friendships and delinquency. This is data for the fourth wave
Students in a Dutch secondary school were followed over a period of one year to study friendships and delinquency. This network denotes whether 2 students went to the same primary school. Delinquency and alcohol use data for all waves appended
Data collected from among the freshman cohort majoring in Sociology in the University of Groningen in 1996-1997. First of the five questionnaires regarding friendships, conducted at the start of the year
Data collected from among the freshman cohort majoring in Sociology in the University of Groningen in 1996-1997. Second of the five questionnaires regarding friendships, , conducted 3 weeks into the program
Data collected from among the freshman cohort majoring in Sociology in the University of Groningen in 1996-1997. Third of the five questionnaires regarding friendships, conducted 6 weeks into the program
Data collected from among the freshman cohort majoring in Sociology in the University of Groningen in 1996-1997. Fourth of the five questionnaires regarding friendships, conducted 13 weeks into the program
Data collected from among the freshman cohort majoring in Sociology in the University of Groningen in 1996-1997. Fifth of the five questionnaires regarding friendships, conducted 35 weeks into the program
Excerpt of 50 girls from the_Teenage Friends and Lifestyle Study_data set; studying friendships and substance use. This data is for first wave in 1995
Excerpt of 50 girls from the_Teenage Friends and Lifestyle Study_data set; studying friendships and substance use. This data is for second wave in 1996
Excerpt of 50 girls from the_Teenage Friends and Lifestyle Study_data set; studying friendships and substance use. This data is for third wave in 1997
First wave of original_Teenage Friends and Lifestyle Study_data set; studying friendships and substance use (1995). Refer to source for more dyadic variables
First wave of original_Teenage Friends and Lifestyle Study_data set; studying friendships and substance use (1995). Refer to source for more dyadic variables
First wave of original_Teenage Friends and Lifestyle Study_data set; studying friendships and substance use (1995). Refer to source for more dyadic variables
Network study of corporate law partnership. This is the advice network among the partners in the firm
Network study of corporate law partnership. This is the advice network among all lawyers in the firm
Network study of corporate law partnership. This is the coworkers network among the partners in the firm
Network study of corporate law partnership. This is the coworkers network among all lawyers in the firm
Network study of corporate law partnership. This is the friendship network among the partners in the firm
Network study of corporate law partnership. This is the friendship network among all lawyers in the firm
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 1, wave 1 (grade 3)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 1, wave 2 (grade 4)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 3, wave 1 (grade 3)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 3, wave 2 (grade 4)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 4, wave 1 (grade 3)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 4, wave 2 (grade 4)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 6, wave 1 (grade 3)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 6, wave 2 (grade 4)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 7, wave 1 (grade 3)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 7, wave 2 (grade 4)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 8, wave 1 (grade 3)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 8, wave 2 (grade 4)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 9, wave 1 (grade 3)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 9, wave 2 (grade 4)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 10, wave 1 (grade 3)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 10, wave 2 (grade 4)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 11, wave 1 (grade 3)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 11, wave 2 (grade 4)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 13, wave 1 (grade 3)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 13, wave 2 (grade 4)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 14, wave 1 (grade 3)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 14, wave 2 (grade 4)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 15, wave 1 (grade 3)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 15, wave 2 (grade 4)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 16, wave 1 (grade 3)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 16, wave 2 (grade 4)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 18, wave 1 (grade 3)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 18, wave 2 (grade 4)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 19, wave 1 (grade 3)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 19, wave 2 (grade 4)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 20, wave 1 (grade 3)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 20, wave 2 (grade 4)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 21, wave 1 (grade 3)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 21, wave 2 (grade 4)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 22, wave 1 (grade 3)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 22, wave 2 (grade 4)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 23, wave 1 (grade 3)
Evolution of friendship network and delinquent behavior collected in Dutch Social Behavior study. School 23, wave 2 (grade 4)